More on the SAM list:

If you really want the nitty-gritty on how this phylogeny was developed,
check out the April 1994 (just got it today), where some of the 'errors'
are explained in a paper by John Harshman;

Harshman, J. 1994. Reweaving the tapestry: what can we learn from Sibley
& Ahlquist (1990)? Auk 111: 377-389.

It's a lot of stats, but interesting to see how it was derived.

Mike Smith
University of Washington
whimbrel at u.washington.edu