>From: IN%"BIRDCHAT at ARIZVM1.ccit.arizona.edu" "National Birding Hotline
>Cooperative (Chat Line)" 3-NOV-1994 10:21:14.11
>To: IN%"BIRDCHAT at ARIZVM1.ccit.arizona.edu" "Multiple recipients of list
>BIRDCHAT"
>CC:
>Subj: RE: Help with shorebird ID?
>
>Return-path: <owner-birdchat at ARIZVM1.CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU>
>Received: from ARIZVM1.ccit.arizona.edu (128.196.133.84)
> by delphi.com (PMDF V4.3-9 #7804) id <01HJ1F8DVT9S9GXVNZ at delphi.com>; Thu,
> 03 Nov 1994 10:20:50 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from ARIZVM1.CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU by ARIZVM1.ccit.arizona.edu
> (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4560; Thu, 03 Nov 94 08:16:17 MST
>Received: from ARIZVM1.CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV at ARIZVM1)
> by ARIZVM1.CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6952; Thu,
> 3 Nov 1994 07:49:20 -0700
>Date: Thu, 03 Nov 1994 09:48:20 -0500
>From: DLANE at DREW.EDU
>Subject: Re: Help with shorebird ID?
>Sender: "National Birding Hotline Cooperative (Chat Line)"
> <BIRDCHAT at ARIZVM1.ccit.arizona.edu>
>To: Multiple recipients of list BIRDCHAT <BIRDCHAT at ARIZVM1.ccit.arizona.edu>
>Reply-to: "National Birding Hotline Cooperative (Chat Line)"
> <BIRDCHAT at ARIZVM1.ccit.arizona.edu>
>Message-id: <01HJ1F8JACRM9GXVNZ at delphi.com>
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>Comments: To: birdchat at arizvm1.ccit.arizona.edu
>
>In article <forest62006 at drew.edu>, lgorbet at MAIL.UNM.EDU writes:
>> The bird had an apparently all-black bill that seemed typical in size and
>> shape for a Dunlin. Our impression was that it was too thick and not
>> evenly curved enough for Curlew Sandpiper (though I have no experience with
>> that species---I just look at field guide paintings and photos). It also
>> had dark, probably black legs. Overall size was a bit bigger than big
>> peeps. Posture was fairly upright (as opposed to the more horizontal
>> posture of, say, Baird's Sandpiper). We thought the legs were maybe a
>> little long for a Dunlin.
>> Our problem was the plumage. The face was very plain grayish except for a
>> whitish supercilium. Definitely no bright colors or very dark crown. I
>> didn't think there was a very dark lores. The back feathers and scapulars
>> had what appeared to be dark brown (might have been black---definitely a
>> cold-toned dark color) centers with fairly broad whitish edgings, giving a
>> very un-winter-Dunlin contrasty look. The feathers *seemed* to be fairly
>> rounded at the tips, though I am not *positive* from the looks I got. The
>> underparts were mostly rather pristine white. No streaking at all that we
>> could see. There was a buffy wash on the throat and upper breast. It
>> stopped much higher than on a Pectoral or Sharp-tailed Sandpiper, and its
>> lower margin was rather weakly defined.
>
>Have you checked in the books (particularly "Shorebirds: an
>identification guide", the "Facts on File Guide to North Atlantic
>Shorebirds", or the "Shorebirds of the Pacific Northwest") for the
>juvenal plumage of the Dunlin? The illustration in the National
>Geographic is pretty bad, I think the one in the new western
>Peterson's is not very good either, and the photo in the Master Guide
>to Birding showes a bird too far along into its molt to 1st basic
>plumage to be a good representation, so don't depend on these. The bird
>you describe seems to fit this plumage rather well. Juvenile Dunlins
>are often not paid much attention because they pass through after the
>real shorebird migration, and therefore are missed by many birders. If
>you have a copy of one (or all) of these books, or can get your hands
>on them, see if this is the bird you saw.
> In this plumage, the back feathers and scapulars have large
>balck centers with buff to rufous edges. The wing coverts have grayer
>centers. The crown and cheek are streaky on a rich brown background,
>and the breast can have a warm buffy color and variable amounts of
>streaking. Some individuals (like the one in the Facts on File guide)
>can have a concentration of dark spots on the sides of the belly
>resembling the black "horse shoe" on the belly of the adult, but this
>can be lacking, I believe.
>>
>> Larry Gorbet lgorbet at mail.unm.edu
>> Anthropology & Linguistics Depts. (505) 883-7378
>> University of New Mexico
>> Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A.
>
>Daniel Lane
>Drew University
>Madison, NJ
>dlane at drew.edu

Although not having any further information (where was it seen and when?)
about this shorebird, I *can* say that it doesn't sound like a juvenile
Dunlin, which (to my knowledge) would always have a streaked breast, a lot
of black on the belly, and quite reddish edgings above. Furthermore,
juvenile Dunlins in North America molt before they migrate south into the
lower 48 and look essentially like adults when they get down here. I can't
say that 100% of them do this, but I've never seen either a live bird or a
museum specimen to indicate otherwise.

The description of this bird sounds more like a peep (stint) than one of
the larger Calidris sandpipers. Unfortunately I'm not sure what "a bit
bigger than big peeps" means, either. Is Baird's a peep? Or is Western the
biggest peep? The bill sounds too long for a basic-plumaged Baird's. Other
than that, I don't have a guess. It certainly doesn't sound like a Dunlin
plumagewise. This is the sort of bird that probably must be photographed
for further deliberation.


Dennis Paulson phone: (206) 756-3798
Slater Museum of Natural History fax: (206) 756-3352
University of Puget Sound email: dpaulson at ups.edu
Tacoma, WA 98416