Subject: Re: English usage
Date: Apr 26 11:32:25 1995
From: Don Baccus - donb at Rational.COM


>Don, in all ornithological journals in English (not so in some other
> languages), species common names must be capitalized. It seems to me that
> this holds in most birding magazines, too. In newspapers and some other
> magazines (Time, for example), bird common names aren't capitalized.

The Oregonian has allowed me to do both without comment (I did this
as a test). But, then, they pretty much stopped editing my
stuff after I learned to write in sentences of six words or
less, with none of the words big.

Is it the dumbing down of Americans which is the problem, or just
the dumbing down of newspaper editors?

> Capitalization is not the rule for other taxonomic groups, and the bizarre
> consequence of this is that you'll see a report or paper in which "the
> tigers chased the Ostrich through the western hemlock forest" (or something
> like that).

Right, which is perfectly acceptable in a technical or
semi-technical (ala Natural History) journal.

I normally read issues of whoever I'm contacting, anyway (no
where close to Natural History!) because one needs a feel
for the level (or lack thereof, in the newspaper case) of
reading ability, etc they target for.

If the newspaper hadn't let me use both styles, I'd have never
thought of this - I began in the caps style, saw other columns
done in lower case (which I personally prefer for personal,
aesthetic reasons, and which fits the convention for mammals
etc), tried that and they took it. So I was left scratching
my head.

> There was a note in Birding several years ago that bird common names had
> become proper names from usage (and "official" status) and that it was
> therefore correct to capitalize them.

I can accept that. It is also interesting to note that I'm not
the first to wonder about this.

Of course, proper nouns don't normally become trashed or reinvented
as frequently as bird names! Maybe we should only capitalize
those that survive three or more revisions of the AOU checklist!

Should it be "Duck Hawk", "duck hawk" or perhaps " 'duck hawk' "
now that this is an improper, rather than proper noun? :)

-Don Baccus-