Stuart,

Please clarify how you arrived at your conclusions posted to this mailing list.

>For your edification, delectation and general amusement I took a look at the
>email addresses of tweeters and came up with the following figures:
>
>1. Total number of tweeters: 317
>
>2. Who pays for email. People either pay directly for access presumably to
>their home or indirectly vai services provided at work.
>
>Pay directly: 72
>Pay indirectly: 220
>Don't know: 25

How on earth can you presume one's payment method based on one's email address?
>
>3. Where do tweeters work:
>
>Education: 159
>Companies: 22
>Government: 36
>Home: 86

How do you know who is _working_ at home vs simply posting from home? And
how do you correlate email addresses with private residences?
>
>4. Largest groups of subscribers.
>
>University of Washington: 96
>Fish & Wildlife: 9
>
>5. Long distance tweeters (minimum figures)
>
>Chicago 1
>Pennsylvannia 1
>Idaho 1
>Oregon 8
>Montana 1
>British Columbia 8
>Califonia 3
>Canada (general) 8
>
>
>Stuart - not as bored as you might think ;-)
>---
>#import "StandardDisclaimer.h";
>
>Stuart MacKay AT&T Wireless Services
>Consultant Developer Oakhurst Building
>Axys V4 14335 NE 24th St.
>ph. (206) 702-5151 Bellevue, WA
>fax (206) 702-5451 98007
>
>stuart.mackay at mccaw.com
>__________________________________________________________
>
>

Awaiting clarification of your scientific method,

Karen

karensw at halcyon.com <---Where am I posting from and how much am I paying
Stuart?? <VBG>