Dennis,

Well you've only put me on the "spot" if I'm "barred" from responding.
Its a hard question and one we grapple with regularly. Clearly seeing animals
exhibited in a naturalistic exhibit which mimics their natural habitat
provides a powerful context for both formal and informal education. If we
succeed in providing an exhibit which does not demean them or give the
impression of human dominance we provide the opportunity for bonding and
deeper appreciation of the natural world. Finally if the exhibit is suitable
for breeding of threatened ore endangered species we've done pretty much what
we've set out to do.

Nevertheless, we absolutely don't want to be the last refuge for some
species, which is unfortunately the case in too many instances. Our first
priority should be to preserve and enhance natural habitat for these
critters. If our education program can get that message out we've fulfilled
an important part of our mission.

The Spotted Owl is a special case which probably illustrates the dilemna. A
while back some politicians were saying that it was ok to continue
unsustainable logging practices because the owls could be bred in captivity.
We absolutely disagree and do not want to be in that untenable position. It
makes no sense.

Finally, a breeding pair would be better than a single animal beause it would
provide an opportunity to maintain those individuals in the gene pool and the
possiblity of release of offspring.

Our only remaining problem is how to cut the logging truck in half to get it
into the exhibit.

Mike Waller
WP Zoo