On Fri, 17 Nov 1995, Eugene Hunn wrote:
> However, Paul S. Martin's "Pleistocene Overkill" theory is considered
> entirely without merit by myself and my archaeological colleagues.

Gene, could you provide a few key references? I'd like to read some of
this stuff, sounds like good (that is references refuting Martin) and
enlightening stuff.

-------------
Michael R. Smith
Univ. of Washington, Seattle
whimbrel at u.washington.edu
http://salmo.cqs.washington.edu/~wagap/mike.html