10/27/95

I usually just delete all the msgs about what we sh/ sh/not
discuss on Tweeters, because I am in the **everything is OK**
camp, as long as it relates to birds, and after reading all
this stuff I still think Tweeters is the greatest and as
far as my opinion goes **everything relates to birds** so
right

ON,

Lisa -- haveing a life in spite of (or because of) reading
so much , said, just this morning:

Message #35 (47 is last):
Date: Fri Oct 27 10:00:15 1995
From: subplot at u.washington.edu ("Lisa M. Smith")
Subject: Re: tweeters topic
To: tweeters at u.washington.edu
Cc: tweeters at u.washington.edu
Reply-To: tweeters at u.washington.edu


On Tue, 24 Oct 1995, Helmboldt, Bruce wrote:

[snip, snip]

> machine. But I'd still prefer to read more about birding and birds
> and less about politics. This group is an escape for me. If I want
> to read about politics, arguments, pollution, etc, I'll buy a
> newspaper.


Well, for heaven's sake--what I'd like to know then, if there are more
people on this list who want to escape and talk *strictly* about birds and
birding than there are who want to talk about things indirectly related,
then why ain't the former talking up a storm? ;-)

---Lisa, who (in spite of having a Life) reads *everything* on Tweeters,
even the bird stufff

======
oops, sorry about the awkward cut and paste there, my machine is
about to go down -- have a nice one, Lisa, and all you other
Tweeters, no matter where you are in the discussion,(s), you are
still a Tweeter if you are reading this, and puts us on the
same side.

Alan Richards / (having a life in Naselle WA)
alanr at ednet1.osl.or.gov
=======

--