Subject: Clarification
Date: Feb 8 18:38:50 1996
From: Bill and Nancy LaFramboise - wlafra at oneworld.owt.com



>>While you are at it, there is another photo that Scott took that does not
>>have the rufous coloring due to lighting/scanning conditions. This photo is
>>a little closer to the real look of the bird. It can be found at
>>http://www.wolfenet.com/~scray/rsha.html It is the fourth picture.
>
>I've looked at these. I'm not quite sure what you mean. "rufous
>morph", as you might guess :), aren't really rufous. Named by
>birders, after all :).

For Tweeterland's information: I wrote Don to clarify that I was aware that
a imm rufous morph wasn't rufous. I only meant that there was another
picture (#4) at a differnet location that shows the bird in question more
like it really looks.

-Nancy


Bill and Nancy LaFramboise
Richland, WA
wlafra at oneworld.owt.com