>The law requiring the conservation license for the "non-traditional" users
>of these state fish and wildlife lands was intended to share the maintenance
>burden across the full range of users of these lands.

While I agree with the principle, I don't remember seeing any obvious
signs to this effect when I last hiked in there, last year. Kind
of hazard for the out-of-state visitor!

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <donb at rational.com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, more at http://www.xxxpdx.com/~dhogaza