Subject: Re: Hatched vs. born
Date: Jun 19 14:36:21 1996
From: mwaller at wolfenet.com - mwaller at wolfenet.com


>Well said, Burt (re: Pronunciation I). And thanks for the etymological
>lesson, Don. :-) Hey, I like this thread on pronunciation! While we're
>off on a tangent, but still within the realm of language/grammar, I'd like
>to ask a question that's been on my mind lately: Why do people, even
>*birders* who should know better, refer to birds being born? Birds are
>*hatched*.
>
>---Lisa
>
>_____________________________________________________
>Lisa M. Smith, Seattle WA <subplot at u.washington.edu>
>
Lisa,

This thread has borne up well considering how it was hatched. But I am about
to crack and can bear it no longer. Perhaps it's a bit of a bore. How am I
to get out of this hole .... no stop me I... anyway I've always thought of
the word "born" as the act of being brought into existence, even when hatched.

Mike

Mike Waller
Manager of Operations
Woodland Park Zoo
5500 Phinney Avenue N.
Seattle, WA 98103
ph: (206)684-4057
fax:(206)684-4817
e-mail: mwaller at wolfenet.com