~rOn Tue, 7 May 1996, Don Baccus wrote:

> Peggi, who didn't mean to say:
>
> >The recipe is 4 parts water to 1 part sugar. Do NOT boil the water to
> >dissolve the feeder.
>
> Gosh, no! Why spend money on a feeder if you intend to simply dissolve
> it?
>
> Or did you mean to imply there are more energy-efficient ways to
> dissolve a feeder? Boiling's not really necessary? :)
>
> - Don Baccus, Portland OR <donb at rational.com>
> Nature photos, on-line guides, at http:://www.xxxpdx.com/~dhogaza

Don,

P'raps Peggi meant to _broil_ the water in the feeder, in which case, the
whole thing would dissolve nicely.
Just trying to clear up this confusion.

Sherrie
hocketts at vetmed.wsu.edu