Subject: *lesser* bins?? (Re: Redtail at Nisqually)
Date: Jan 29 09:59:48 1997
From: PAGODROMA at aol.com - PAGODROMA at aol.com


1/27/97, Tom Foote writes:

<<...I only had my lesser bins with me..sigh-hh...>>

What?!!? *lesser* bins?? LOL!! Oh, so we call them 'lesser' bins now, and
I guess the others must be the 'greater' bins, eh? Oops! ...that was a
Canadianism that just kinda slipped out. I hang around Mike Force too much
:-) What should I call my Leica 10X42? Oh, and of course, what on Earth
must I call my 50-pound Fujinon 20X150's?? Well, at $12K, they're "not"
mine, but I use and hog 'em like they were. *Emperors* sound pretty good, as
opposed to just the mere 'Kings' or 'Giants' which are 20X140's of little and
lesser quality. Well, at least I don't have any 'little', 'least', or 'fairy'
bins in my possession. :-)) 'Loony' bins, yes; several; but that's another
subject.

P.S. I'm sending this spiced up a bit with some experimental colors and
styles with AOL3.0. Do these arrive and appear on *tweeters* and get passed
on to other members E-mail (assuming you have a color monitor), or is this
all defaulted to a standard font, style, and black & white? Posted on the WEB
, I'm guessing it will show up in black & white. Worse case scenario; maybe
it's all defaulted and deleted :-||

Richard Rowlett <Pagodroma at aol.com>
Bellevue, WA