At 09:40 PM 10/12/97 -0700, you wrote:

>> > Let's not add to the anti-falconry stuff that's already
>> > out there..

>> Why do you construe this as "anti-falconry"?

>Don--

> well, maybe it isn't exactly anti-falconry...I guess
> I reacted to the assumption that if something is
> awry or something is different it must be the falconers
> tinkering with genetics...

If you see a grine x gyr cross flying around, won't you presume it's a
falconer's bird that's gotten away from its owner? I certainly would.

Just because something's true doesn't make it "anti-falconry".




- Don Baccus, Portland OR <donb at rational.com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net