Subject: Re: Reply-to-sender
Date: Feb 06 23:09:55 1998
From: Wilson E Cady - gorgebirds at juno.com


Then I vote "Reply to sender."
Wilson Cady
Washougal, WA.
gorgebirds at juno.com "Never Pet A Burning Dog"
360-835-5947 gorgebirds at juno.com


On Fri, 6 Feb 1998 07:58:19 -0800 (PST) "D. Victor"
<dvictor at u.washington.edu> writes:
>On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Gayle Benton wrote:
>
>> Hi Tweeters-
>> I have been wondering, during this whole debate, if one of the
>options
>> creates less work for our "Benevolent Tweetator". If so, I think we
>might
>> take this into consideration in the way we vote. I, personally,
>would like
>> to do anything to make this easier on Dan, since I feel very
>privileged to
>> have the use of Tweeters in the first place. What do you say, Dan?
>Is one
>> way less work than the other?
>
>I find Reply-to-sender is easiest on me. Thanks for asking, Gayle.
>
> Dan Victor, Seattle, WA <dvictor at u.washington.edu>
> Web = http://weber.u.washington.edu/~dvictor/dan.html
>
>
>

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]