When I first heard of changing the default, I thought I was in favor of it.
But I have changed my mind. I agree with Gary DuVall that Tweeters is for
"chatting" and not just for official-type postings. It wasn't really broke
(so there were a few messages that should have been private -- Oh well). So
I'm in favor of un-fixing it (i.e. setting things back to the way they
were).

== Michael Hobbs
== Kirkland WA
== MJCT_Hobbs at msn.com

-----Original Message-----
From: SCN User <bj054 at scn.org>
To: Tweeters <tweeters at u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, January 07, 1998 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: reply-to change


>
>On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Hal Opperman wrote, in part:
>
>> I do think that the default is better the new way, but it is evident that
>> many subscribers prefer it the way it was.
>
>Indeed.
>
>>Tweeters is a hybrid list that serves two audiences.
>
>No more so than any other list.

...etc, etc, etc.