Hello tweeters:(I hope this is going to everyone)

Would all Mute Swans please speak up.
A YES vote means change it back the way it was.
A NO vote means I don't like it the way it is. ?-))
Be a good citizen of tweeters and get out there and VOTE!

Jerry Converse
Grand Coulee, WA

Michael & Janka Hobbs wrote:
snip:
>I agree with Gary DuVall that Tweeters is for
>"chatting" and not just for official-type postings. It wasn't really broke

> I'm in favor of un-fixing it (i.e. setting things back to the way they
> were).
>
> == Michael Hobbs
> == Kirkland WA
> == MJCT_Hobbs at msn.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SCN User <bj054 at scn.org>
> To: Tweeters <tweeters at u.washington.edu>
> Date: Wednesday, January 07, 1998 4:19 PM
> Subject: Re: reply-to change
>
> >
> >On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Hal Opperman wrote, in part:
> >
> >> I do think that the default is better the new way, but it is evident that
> >> many subscribers prefer it the way it was.
> >
> >Indeed.
> >
> >>Tweeters is a hybrid list that serves two audiences.
> >
> >No more so than any other list.
>
> ...etc, etc, etc.