Subject: Re: reply-to change
Date: Jan 8 14:44:40 1998
From: "D. Victor" - dvictor at u.washington.edu


On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Michael Price wrote:

> I'd suggest that we haven't yet
> given it enough time for fair trial; why not let it go to the end of
> January, give it an *honest* appraisal--not to mention giving it a
> chance--and revisit the question in the first week of February?
> Comment?

And on Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Rob Saecker wrote:

> This is a great idea, let's give it a rest, and see how we feel after
> living with it a while.

Thanks Michael and Rob,

I agree. It would be better to vote after we've gotten used to it for a
month or so, giving it a fair chance. Birdchat uses it with their 2400+
subscribers and it seems to work well for them.

Thanks for your efforts adjusting to this change,

Dan Victor, Seattle, WA <dvictor at u.washington.edu>
Tweeters = http://weber.u.washington.edu/~dvictor/