Subject: Re: Feedback requested
Date: Jan 12 10:39:59 1998
From: "Robert Taylor" - taylorrt at foxinternet.net
Hi John
Please continue the postings. The RBA's provide an opportunity to assess
what is moving in the area. I would also request that even if a bird has
been seen for 9 months in an area that if it is an unusual bird for the
area, please keep posting it. When I travel, the first thing I do is call
the hotline, RBA, check local postings, Audubon, etc and even if all the
folks in the Vancouver area are tired of hearing about the Eider or Xantu's
IT REMAINS VERY IMPORTANT TO OTHERS.
I saw Mike's comments and I can understand the frustration on both sides.
I have been both the problem and the solution at different times! At one
job the agency was ranked best in the nation and yet they were unwilling to
continue to develop innovative techniques that would have secured their
position (in my humble opinion!). The argument was we're doing better than
expected and we will hold that position. Sometimes (as in RBAs, etc)
improvements can be made but dedicated volunteers are hard to find and
keep. Improvement often equates to more man-hours that are not available.
Please accept my thanks for the fine job you folks are doing. It would be
a duller Tweeters without Vancouver, Oregon, Washington, E Wash/Idaho RBAs.
Bob
Federal Way, WA
taylorrt at foxinternet.net
----------
> From: John Chandler <chandler at uniserve.com>
> To: Tweeters <tweeters at u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Feedback requested
> Date: Sunday, January 11, 1998 10:29 PM
>
> Tweets,
>
> In a recent post Mike Price expressed concerns about the level of service
> provided by the Vancouver RBA. I'm interested in what the rest of you
> think. Do you see any value in having the Vancouver RBA scripts posted
to
> Tweeters? Do you enjoy reading them? Should the posts be continued?
>
> Please reply privately or publicly.
>
> Thanks,
>
> John Chandler
> Alandale Training Corporation
> Richmond, BC, Canada
> Phone: 604-274-8777
> email: chandler at uniserve.com