Subject: Logos, Hats, Shirts and A GATHERING
Date: Sep 10 11:22:01 1999
From: Deborah Wisti-Peterson - nyneve at u.washington.edu



hello bob and tweets.

i think that is a fantastic idea (nevermind the fact that my
"study organism" is the white-crowned sparrow) and i would also
like add that it is my opinion that NOTHING is too complex or
obscure for tweeters!

regards,

Deborah Wisti-Peterson email:nyneve at u.washington.edu
Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash, USA
Visit me on the web: http://students.washington.edu/~nyneve/
<><><>Graduate School: it's not just a job, it's an indenture!<><><>


On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Bob Mauritsen wrote:

>
> I'm going to embarrass myself and throw this out without much thought:
>
> There are the same number of letters in "TWEETERS" as there are
> syllables in the regular song of some white-crowned sparrows:
>
> da-DAh-dadadada-dah-DUH
> t w e e t e r s
>
> Why not have a measure or two of musical script, with the
> notes for the WC sparrow, but where each note is really
> a morphed letter from "TWEETERS"? Each note would be a
> rounded letter, i.e., a letter compressed into a circle,
> and could be filled in or empty, and have a tail.
> The musical notes would go along with the connotation of
> song that the word "TWEETERS" evokes.
>
> OK, so it's too complex and obscure. But at least I got it out of my
> head, so I don't have to think about it anymore. :)
>
> Bob Mauritsen
> Green Lake
> Seattle
>
>
>
>
>
>