Mike, I could not agree more with your last paragraph, as to how you miss
the good old days...well said! R/Steve


>From: "Mike and Shirli" <crexcrex at wolfenet.com>
>Reply-To: crexcrex at wolfenet.com
>To: "Dan Victor" <dcv at scn.org>, <tweeters at u.washington.edu>
>Subject: Re: Ooops Not!
>Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 09:33:24 -0800
>
>Despite Hal's suggestion that everyone on Tweeters has seen the guidelines,
>I had not. I have subscribed and unsubscribed to Tweeters many times over
>the years (due to travel, busy schedule, or other reasons), and stopped
>reading the Tweeters subscription mail after the first or second time,
>figuring it was the same. I was apparently unsubscribed when the changes
>were made, so I missed the changes and whatever discourse led to them being
>instituted.
>
>I have now read the guidelines and will follow the rules. I apologize for
>creating a raft of e-mail about an off-topic subject.
>
>However, I also miss the old days, when it seemed there were more
>wide-ranging, back-and-forth conversations, often a bit hot but normally
>civil, more input from professional ornithologists and other scientists,
>and
>the wonderfully open and often-voiced opinions of Don Baccus. But perhaps
>that is a normal progression of this new technology as it becomes more
>mainstream.
>
>Mike Seamans
>Seattle,
>crexcrex at wolfenet.com
>
>I
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dan Victor <dcv at scn.org>
>To: Mike and Shirli <crexcrex at wolfenet.com>
>Cc: Tweeters (Cascadia) Birding Email <tweeters at u.washington.edu>
>Date: Monday, January 31, 2000 6:01 PM
>Subject: Re: Ooops Not!
>
>
> >Hi Mike,
> >
> >Please take a look at the posting guidelines, especially the
>inappropriate
> >topics section. If you or anyone else have further comments on these
> >guidelines please send them to me privately at dcv at scn.org
> >
> > http://www.scn.org/earth/tweeters/guidelines.html
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >--Dan
> > Dan Victor, Seattle, mailto:dcv at scn.org ___.-////
> > Web = http://www.scn.org/~dcv/ \_>
> >
> >On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Mike and Shirli wrote:
> >
> >> Nonsense! Who has determined that cat issues are not
> >> appropriate for Tweeters? ...
> >
> >
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com