Tweeters --

Do we have to argue about whether or not to argue about cats? For Heaven's
sake, follow Dan Victor's guidelines or stay out of it! Nobody can say
anything new about the subject anyway.

Dan Lindsay, Bellevue
susandan2 at earthlink.net
----------
>From: Diann MacRae <tvulture at halcyon.com>
>To: tweeters at u.washington.edu
>Subject: Re: Ooops Not!
>Date: Mon, Jan 31, 2000, 5:46 PM
>

>Hello, Tweets
>
>I hate to get involved in this, but I really do feel strongly that the list
>is under Dan Victor's command and whether we like it or not we should
>follow the rules set down. To have to go through a "dreaded cat thread"
>every 3-4 months is unacceptable, in my mind. There is a wonderful website
>about this subject prepared by the American Bird Conservatory. Please go
>there for information: <http://www.abcbirds.org/catindoo.htm> They have a
>wonderful array of cat-bird subjects to look through.
>
>I don't think we can overlook the tolerance of Dan Victor in regard to our
>sometimes volatile list. We all care and many of us are very opinionated.
>Let's keep the list like it is meant to be.
>
>Cheers, Diann
>_________________
>Diann MacRae, Newsletter Editor
>Washington Ornithological Society
>Bothell, Washington
>mailton: tvulture at halcyon.com
>