hello tweets,

i thought this might be interesting ...

regards,

Deborah Wisti-Peterson, PhD Candidate nyneve at u.washington.edu
Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash, USA
Visit me on the web: http://students.washington.edu/~nyneve/
Love the creator? Then protect the creation.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Published on Tuesday, May 8, 2001 in the Guardian of London

Evolution Is In Our Hands, Say Scientists
Biologists warned to focus on the future, not the riddles of the past

by James Meek

=A0
Evolution scientists today warn of the spread of a global "pest and weed"
environment, with animals and plants such as rats, cockroaches, nettles and
thistles flourishing at the expense of more specialized wild organisms.

The scientists say that, in the next 5 million years, short-term evolution
will favor those species able to thrive in the margins of human settlement.

They also warned that decisions made in the next few decades will determine
the fate of 500,000 billion people, adding that efforts to protect species
and wild habitats now will dictate the future course of evolution.

In their startling wake-up call, the group of US, African and British
researchers writing in the US journal, Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, compared the present mass extinction of species on Earth to
past mass extinctions; then, it took roughly 5 million years for biological
diversity to reassert itself.

"Suppose that the average number of people on Earth during the future
recovery period is 2.5 billion, by contrast with the 6 billion today," said
two of the scientists, Norman Myers of Oxford University and Andrew Knoll o=
f
Harvard.

"Under these conditions, the total number of people affected by what we do =
-
or do not do - during the next few decades will be in the order of 500
trillion, 10,000 times more people than have existed until now.

"We are thus engaged in by far the largest 'decision' every taken by one
human community on the unconsulted behalf of future societies."

The scientists suggested that the world is entering a new period of
geological time, the Homogecene, marked by all parts of the planet
increasingly coming to resemble each other.

David Woodruff, of the University of California at San Diego, said that
between 3,000 and 30,000 of Earth's estimated 10 million species were
disappearing each year.

"We live at a geological instant when global rates of extinction are at an
all time high for the last 65 million years, and are increasing," he said.

"The biosphere will have fewer species and be subject to more weed, pest an=
d
disease outbreaks...the new [habitats] will be more easily disturbed and
invaded, and will have an aesthetically unappealing dullness."

None of this means that evolution will stop - just that it might go in an
undesirable direction. "Evolution is not over - set back perhaps - but by n=
o
means over," Dr Woodruff said.

Scientists who studied evolution, he said, were obliged to abandon their
preference for looking backwards and begin considering the future.

"Some of us advocate a shift from saving things, the products of evolution,
to saving the underlying process, evolution itself," he said.

"Like it or not, evolutionary biologists have to recognize that the ultimat=
e
test of their science is not their ability to solve the riddles of the past
and the origin of species, but rather to manage their viability and prevent
their premature extinction - to manage the biosphere's future."

DR Myers said that much more emphasis should be put on protecting plants an=
d
insects, to protect the evolutionary pool, rather than on preserving big
beasts like tigers or elephants, which are too few to evolve.

Environmentalists needed to think not just about saving the species we have=
,
but about protecting the planet's ability to generate the species of the
future.

"A lot of people would say, 'no, we don't want creepy crawlies', but if we
lost half the mammals, we could get by," DR Myers said.

"If we lost half of all insects, with their pollinating function, our
agriculture would be in trouble in just a few seasons.

"We live at a time when, in just the next two decades, we can save some ver=
y
fundamental processes. If we do that, I think we will be thanked by hundred=
s
of thousands of generations to come, and if we don't, we will be criticized
for millions of years."

Going

Hamilton frogs

One of the rarest frogs in the world, Hamilton frogs are small amphibians
endemic to Stephens Island in the Cook Strait, New Zealand. First discovere=
d
in 1915, about 200 exist. Their future is threatened by stoat invasions

Hawaiian fern

Only one single Diplazium molokaiensis, a member of the wood fern family,
has been found in Hawaii during the past two decades, and the species'
extinction seems inevitable

Alabama sturgeon

Endangered after a reduction of at least 80% of the population in 10 years.
Overfishing, and loss of habitat to blame

Gone

Dusky seaside sparrow

Became extinct in 1987. It is widely considered to be the most recent,
well-documented extinction of a vertebrate in the US. Disappearance due
entirely to the loss of a natural habitat, the Everglades

Golden Toad

Discovered in Monteverde, Costa Rica, in 1963. Despite being protected, it
was presumed extinct when by 1989 the one lone male disappeared

Charco Palma pupfish

Due to falling levels of essential water, the Charco Palma pupfish became
extinct in 1994. The species was found at a single spring, Charco La Palma,
Aramberri, southern Nuevo Le=F3n, Mexico.

The 50-70 pupfish disappeared when the spring water was used for human
consumption and for irrigation

=A9 Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001

###

=A0Share This Article With A Friend
=A0
Common Dreams NewsCenter=A0is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.
=A0 =A0 =A0
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are
making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, an=
d
social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyrigh=
t
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this
site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your
own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyrigh=
t
owner.


Tell Us What You Think: editor at commondreams.org
Making News?: news at newscenter.org



=A9 Copyrighted 1997-2001 Common Dreams
www.commondreams.org
A 'Cookie-Free' Website

=A0