I think that having a debate is perfectly normal for humans, and I think
that it should be allowed. Bringing it to private emails, no one will get to
see both sides, see the information that is poured out to help win the
fight. I think there is nothing wrong with it, and the more strict it gets,
the less fun it is. There's nothing like a good fight. Eventually, it will
die out. If you don't like it oh well, but let people enjoy it. I like it.
It's fun. There is NOTHING wrong with disagreeing, this isn't a utopian
society, never will be. So enjoy it.

Blake Iverson
Arlington, WA
coopershwk at hotmail.com


>From: "Scott G. Downes" <downess at cwu.EDU>
>Reply-To: downess at cwu.EDU
>To: tweeters at u.washington.edu
>Subject: Falconry debate, please stop
>Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 20:56:24 -0800
>
>The people who are arguing back and forth on tweeters about pros and cons
>of falconry, while it may be passionate to you, wouldn't it be better to
>continue it as private emails among the parties, so that the rest of us are
>not subjected to what seems to be bordering on outright flaming...
>
>Also.. Dan, there appears to be a distinction here, if talking about
>populations or regulations thats one thing, but might we need to consider
>this issue about whether falconry is right or wrong as a banned topic?
>There is probably as stong of opinions as the cat thread, and I see these
>discussions as doing little to educate people, but more to say "I'm right"
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Scott Downes
>downess at cwu.edu
>Ellensburg WA


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail