Well said Gary! When compared to the actual cost, I have a much bigger
gripe with the logistics of making sure you're paid up in all areas you
might wander into on a bird trip.
John
www.featherphotography.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Bletsch [mailto:garybletsch at yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 9:26 PM
To: Tweeters at u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: Birding Stamp


Dear Tweeters,

I cannot decide whether I agree or disagree with the notion of fee-paying
to watch birds. However, assuming that birders must pay, I do wish that they
could pay a single fee, say a hundred bucks a year or so, and get access to
state wildlife areas, state parks, and national parks and forests.

Most birders make a lot of short visits to these places. Many of us tend
to ignore things like giant stone carvings of presidents, gift shoppes,
picnic areas, interpretive signs, and the like. We tend to search for the
Blue-wattled Sparrowlet, make a note about whatever other birds (and other
animals and plants) are present, and then move on. I suspect that this sort
of activity is different from that of most other users--most non-birders
would not make a ten-minute stop at a state park.

Right now I have a ten-dollar yellow sticker for game department lands, a
fifty-dollar green plastic windshield sticker for state parks, and a
seldom-used cardboard mirror-dangler (the price of which I cannot remember)
for certain USFS lands. I'd rather have just one sticker (or dangler) --a
"birding license!" The monies could be divvied up among the various agencies
that recognize it. Plus, some artist could be commissioned each year to
design it.

Good birding and Happy Holidays!







Yours truly,

Gary Bletsch

near Lyman (Skagit County), Washington

garybletsch at yahoo.com



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Get your photo on the big screen in Times Square