Hmm, I can understand a little variance on Ruth's shots
because they are more distant, and a bit pixelated when
enlarged enough to measure this ratio. However I get
..114 or less for all of Denny's, and I just double checked
and confirmed that.

Not sure which photo Denny2 refers to, since 2 on his
site is a spread wing shot where the back isn't visible.

I'm enlarging to where the body is around 3.5 to 4 inches (or more)
on the screen to reduce margin for error on the bill measurement.

So if anyone is really interested, I'd suggest trying it for yourself. It's
a great way to waste time.

Cheers,

Phil