Subject: [Tweeters] Yes and no on BBWO
Date: Jul 10 18:44:00 2005
From: Aaron Martin - aamartin at gmail.com


I don't want to speak one way or the other regarding the use of
banding codes, however some might find the following link useful.

http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/bbl/manual/aspeclst.htm

This is a link to a list of the 4 letter banding codes.

Aaron Martin
Seattle, WA

On 7/10/05, Guttman, Burt <GuttmanB at evergreen.edu> wrote:
>
> Although it's hardly worth the effort, it took quite a while to figure what
> "BBWO" stands for. We've had this debate before, and it's clear that many
> people share my opinion that these damned abbreviations are confusing and
> unnecessary. If people on this list won't stop throwing them around so
> casually, I'm going to quit the list or ask Dan Victor to prohibit their
> use. Lots of things have been prohibited on Tweeters, and I nominate this
> for another one.
>
> In a decidedly PO'd mood,
>
> Burt Guttman
> The Evergreen State College
> Olympia, WA 98505 guttmanb at evergreen.edu
> Home: 7334 Holmes Island Road S. E., Olympia, 98503
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tweeters mailing list
> Tweeters at u.washington.edu
> http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters
>
>
>