Subject: [Tweeters] Corrections to Brush-Finch story
Date: Oct 10 10:25:56 2006
From: Ian Paulsen - birdbooker at zipcon.net
HI:
FYI
--
Ian Paulsen
Bainbridge Island, WA, USA
A.K.A.: "Birdbooker"
"Rallidae all the way!"
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:08:51 +0000
From: Thomas Donegan <thomasdonegan at YAHOO.CO.UK>
Reply-To: Bulletin Board for Ornithologists working with Neotropical Birds
<NEOORN-L at LISTSERV.LSU.EDU>
To: NEOORN-L at LISTSERV.LSU.EDU
Subject: [NEOORN-L] Nova esp[iso-2022-jp] e de ave descoberta nos Andes
Col ombianos
Re the article posted by Masi below and before someone else makes these points in criticism:
We explained in detail to the journalists:
1. This bird was described as a subspecies, not a species (though arguably it may be a species under some concepts).
2. There were dead type specimens, including one we took which died being roosted overnight. The live type was one of a few paratypes.
3. The "first" use of a live type was the first for a bird since the ICZN's recent approval of such techniques, not the first ever (there was a monkey before it).
The following release contains a comprehensive summary of the discovery:
http://www.proaves.org/article.php?id_article=232
http://www.proaves.org/article.php?id_article=231
Cheers, Thomas.
___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com