one data point ( being this website) = "Citizen-science is not science" ??
never knew you could draw a valid conclusion from just one data point.

Chris Kessler
Seattle

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Jim Greaves <lbviman at blackfoot.net> wrote:

> Inconclusive, tenuous statements like "we are confident...we
> photographed..." make it likely they have neither seen nor photographed what
> they claim. If the confidence is there, where are the photos? They should
> not be posting this stuff until they have something they can actually prove
> is what they claim it to be. Instead they plead for privacy, while
> publicizing non-substantive results. Citizen-science is not science - Jim
> Greaves, MT
>
>
> At 01:00 PM 3/21/2010, tweeters-request at mailman2.u.washington.edu wrote:
>
>> March 20th
>>
>> I stumbled onto a website that may be of interest to Ivory-billed
>> Woodpecker chasers:
>>
>> http://www.south-run.com/coyote/summary.htm
>>
>> I haven't read much of it yet, but there it is.
>>
>> Phil Hotlen
>> Bellingham, WA
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tweeters mailing list
> Tweeters at u.washington.edu
> http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/pipermail/tweeters/attachments/20100321/075756b4/attachment.htm