Subject: [Tweeters] "Killing Barred Owls to Help Spotted Owls"
Date: Feb 7 15:18:36 2011
From: Wayne Weber - contopus at telus.net


Doug,

I would disagree with one comment you made-- that the proposed killing of
Barred Owls is a "potential departure in wildlife management philosophy".
Trying to assist endangered or threatened species or populations by lethal
control of predators or competitors is nothing new.

In Michigan, tens of thousands of cowbirds have been killed in a trapping
program which began in the 1970s and, I believe, continues today. The
Kirtland's Warbler probably would be extinct today if not for this trapping
program, although shortage of habitat is at least as much a cause of their
rarity as cowbird parasitism. It is believed that when enough young jack
pine habitat is created, cowbird control will no longer be necessary. I hope
they are right.

Closer to home, coyote control has been carried on for years around the
Malheur NWR to improve the breeding success of Sandhill Cranes-- and I don't
believe this population is officially threatened, although it is small and
localized.

In all three cases-- cowbirds, coyotes, and Barred Owls-- the range and/or
numbers of the species have increased greatly because of human-caused
factors.

The proposal to help Spotted Owls by killing Barred Owls is indeed
controversial, but it has been kicking around for at least 7 or 8 years now.
(Western Screech-Owls have also been heavily impacted by Barred Owls to the
point of being threatened, at least in coastal BC, if not in WA.) Wildlife
management, by its very nature, is frequently interventionist in its
approach. The alternative, in some cases, would be allowing species or
populations to go extinct without lifting a finger to help them. I have my
doubts that the proposed (experimental) Barred Owl control program will be a
success, but I feel strongly that it is worth a serious attempt.

At any rate, thanks very much for bringing this draft EIS to our attention.

Wayne C. Weber
Delta, BC
contopus at telus.net
(Retired wildlife biologist)



-----Original Message-----
From: tweeters-bounces at mailman2.u.washington.edu
[mailto:tweeters-bounces at mailman2.u.washington.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas
Canning
Sent: February-07-11 1:00 PM
To: tweeters at u.washington.edu
Subject: [Tweeters] "Killing Barred Owls to Help Spotted Owls"

Tweets -

Today's Seattle Times carries a very brief article on a draft
environmental impact statement in preparation by the US Fish & Wildlife
Service in Oregon addressing the proposed shooting of Barred Owls to
benefit Spotted Owls. Ultimately, this program could be expanded to
Washington and northern California, which could result in the killing
of 1,200 to 1,500 Barred Owls.

The Barred Owl - Spotted Owl debate has been going on for decades; this
is simply the latest grasping at straws.

The two most recent issues of Northwestern Naturalist carry a two-part
paper titled: "Killing Barred Owls to Help Spotted Owls I: A Global
Perspective" (91(2): 107 - 133), and "Killing Barred Owls to Help
Spotted Owls II: Implications for Many Other Range-expanding Species
(91(3): 251 - 270).

The abstract for Part I reads (in part): "Barred Owls expanded their
range to include western North America and have been competing with
federally threatened Northern Spotted Owls for a few decades. To help
protect Spotted Owls, the US Fish and Wildlife Service is considering
conducting a 3- to 10-y study in which as many as 2150 to 4650 Barred
Owls would be killed and, possibly, conducted long-term management of
Barred Owls. ...If the precedent-setting removal study as described
here is implemented, it would, during its 1st year, result in the death
of 36 times more raptors than in all other conservation-based projects
combined in the United States and its territories, and 84 times more
raptors than the largest ongoing effort worldwide. This study could
cost $1 million annually; simplifying the cost to dollars per Barred
Owl killed approximates $700 per Barred Owl for the first year and
$2800 per Barred Owl for each subsequent year."

The abstract for Part II reads (in part): "...I present information
concerning how frequently range expansions of North American birds and
other factors may precipitate similar management issues in the near
future. ... If thousands of Barred Owls are killed because they
expanded their range and are competing with a species of concern, it
seems likely USFWS soon would need to consider whether to lethally
intervene between many other species of native birds due to the high
frequency and large extent of range expansions..."

The author, Kent B. Livezey, is a US Fish and Wildlife Service
employee.

These papers describe an interesting potential departure in wildlife
management philosophy, one that is highly interventionist, and very
controversial within in federal wildlife management community. Livezey
presents a very professional discussion of the matter, one which also
does us the service of placing the proposal into a more public forum
than federal government documents.

Northwestern Naturalist is published by the Society for Northwestern
Vertebrate Biology (http://www.thesnvb.org/; it is the successor
publication to The Murrelet, published by the Pacific Northwest Bird
and Mammal Society, predecessor to the SNVB. Copies of the Northwestern
Naturalist should be available at the library of any academic
institution which has an ornithology program.

Doug



*************************
Douglas Canning
Olympia, Washington
dcanning at scattercreek.com
dcanning at igc.org
*************************



_______________________________________________
Tweeters mailing list
Tweeters at u.washington.edu
http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters