Subject: [Tweeters] washington state bird
Date: Feb 7 19:45:44 2011
From: Christy - christysway at gmail.com


Hear, hear! I agree with this line of reasoning. If it ain't broke...

Christy Anderson
Bellevue WA

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:17 PM, dave templeton <crazydave65 at gmail.com>wrote:

> hola:
>
> if i thought it were necessary to change the state bird, i'd suggest
> peale's peregrine.
>
> that said, there seems to be no compelling reason to change state birds
> every so often, in my judgment, anyway. that goldfinch is hot looking and
> fun to watch. have we no sense of history?
>
> finally, it costs money and takes legislative time to print, distribute and
> act on bills. seems to me the legislature has more than enough real
> business on its plate w/o throwing this into the sausage grinder.
>
> regards,
>
> t
>
> --
> dave templeton
> fall city, wa
>
> crazydave65atgmaildaughtcom
>
> "Don't worry about the world coming to an end today; it's already tomorrow
> in Australia." Charles Schultz
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tweeters mailing list
> Tweeters at u.washington.edu
> http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/pipermail/tweeters/attachments/20110207/e78ce111/attachment.htm