Subject: [Tweeters] Osprey Nest Gone at 405 and 116th
Date: Apr 6 14:05:43 2016
From: Christine Southwick - clsouth at

It's not legal to remove a migratory bird's nest.

I've often wondered why cell towers couldn't put a platform above part of the tower for osprey usage?

Christine Southwick
N Seattle/Shoreline
clsouthwick at

On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Snell Margaret wrote:

> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:01:08 -0700
> From: Snell Margaret <masnell at>
> To: Tweeters <tweeters at>
> Subject: [Tweeters] Osprey Nest Gone at 405 and 116th
> I passed by where the osprey had returned to the cell tower at I-405 and 116th St. in Kirkland about 2 pm today. A person was on top of the cell tower and whatever portion of a nest had been built had been removed. So I think the osprey is being encouraged to find a new home. Margaret Snell_______________________________________________
> Tweeters mailing list
> Tweeters at

Christine Southwick
Pharmacy Administration
University of Washington Medical Center
Box 356015
1959 NE Pacific Street
Seattle, WA 98195-6015
phone: 206-598-7398; fax 206-598-6075

This electronic message transmission contains information which may be
confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the
use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of
the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this
electronic transmission in error, please delete this message. Thank you.