Subject: [Tweeters] Osprey Nest Gone at 405 and 116th
Date: Apr 6 14:06:10 2016
From: Philip Dickinson - pdickins at

My question is whether such an action would violate the 98-year-old federal
Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It seems that it would unless a permit has been

Phil Dickinson
Lake Stevens

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Snell Margaret <masnell at> wrote:

> I passed by where the osprey had returned to the cell tower at I-405 and
> 116th St. in Kirkland about 2 pm today. A person was on top of the cell
> tower and whatever portion of a nest had been built had been removed. So I
> think the osprey is being encouraged to find a new home. Margaret
> Snell_______________________________________________
> Tweeters mailing list
> Tweeters at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...