Subject: [Tweeters] Osprey Nest Gone at 405 and 116th Date: Apr 6 14:06:10 2016 From: Philip Dickinson - pdickins at gmail.com
My question is whether such an action would violate the 98-year-old federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It seems that it would unless a permit has been granted.
Phil Dickinson Lake Stevens
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Snell Margaret <masnell at comcast.net> wrote:
> I passed by where the osprey had returned to the cell tower at I-405 and > 116th St. in Kirkland about 2 pm today. A person was on top of the cell > tower and whatever portion of a nest had been built had been removed. So I > think the osprey is being encouraged to find a new home. Margaret > Snell_______________________________________________ > Tweeters mailing list > Tweeters at u.washington.edu > http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/pipermail/tweeters/attachments/20160406/57283b56/attachment.htm