Hi all,

I've been shooting for a couple months with a Sony RX10 Mark IV, and am getting outstanding results, including very nice handheld flight shots. The IV vs. the III supposedly has significantly improved autofocus technology over the III - at a cost of $1700. I'm a fan - first Sony camera I've used. Previously for a small bird photography camera I was using the Canon SX-50. The Sony is much superior, but of course more costly.

John Tubbs
Lacey, WA
johntubbs at comcast.net


----- Original Message -----

From: "Jane Hadley" <hadleyj1725 at gmail.com>
To: "Dear Tweeters" <tweeters at u.washington.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 4, 2018 3:55:48 PM
Subject: [Tweeters] Ultra Zoom Digital Camera reviews



For those interested in ultra-zoom digital cameras, the latest Consumer Reports (June issue) reviews 20 what it calls "advanced point-and-shoot" cameras. Four of the 20 cameras reviewed zoom to at least 600mm, so I am classifying them as ultra-zoom cameras that would work well for bird photos.


Here's how Consumer Reports rated the four ultra-zooms.


The best-rated of the four was the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III, which zooms to 600mm, costs $1300, has 20 megapixels, and weighs 41 ounces. It had a score of 78. This camera was rated No. 2 out of the 20 reviewed. (No. 1 was the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II, which zooms only to 200mm and had a score of 79.)


The second-best ultra-zoom was the Canon PowerShot G3 X, which came in 5th with a score of 74. It costs $900 and zooms to 600mm. It has 20 megapixels and weighs 27 ounces.


A distant third place among the ultra-zooms went to the Canon PowerShot SX60HS, which received a score of 57 and ranked 19 out of 20. It costs $480, zooms to 1365mm, has 16 megapixels and weighs 24 ounces.

Just behind it in dead last place was the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 with a score of 55. It costs $315, zooms to 720mm, has 18 megapixels and weighs only 10 ounces.

It appears that the ratings pretty much track the cost of the camera, with the most expensive rating highest and the least expensive ranking lowest. The highest ranked is also the heaviest, and the lowest ranked the lightest. Unfortunate correlations both!

Consumer Reports says that the overall scores were based primarily on image quality and ease of use but also factored in video, image stabilization, the screen and the viewfinder, where applicable. "Image quality...is based on tests performed in auto and manual mode with regular photos, low-light photos, and flash photos. We judge color reproduction, dynamic range, resolution, distortion, reflection, and image stabilization, along with video shooting." The article does not provide information on sensor-size, though that information is easily available elsewhere online.

The quest goes on for a reasonably priced lightweight camera with excellent image quality and long zoom! Probably an unrealistic goal.

Jane Hadley

Seattle, WA




_______________________________________________
Tweeters mailing list
Tweeters at u.washington.edu
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman11.u.washington.edu/pipermail/tweeters/attachments/20180505/354fd550/attachment.html>